Table of Contents:
Introduction
What is a blockchain consortium?
Why blockchain consortia are critical for businesses today.
Key Governance Considerations
2.1 Decision-Making Authority
2.2 Handling Disputes and Ensuring Alignment
2.3 Flexibility and Adaptability for Growth
Financial and Funding Structures
3.1 Initial Funding and Ongoing Financial Commitments
3.2 Revenue Sharing and Ownership Models
3.3 Financial Implications for New Members and IP Development
Legal and Structuring Considerations
4.1 Legal Entity Structure and Jurisdiction
4.2 Tax, Regulatory, and Compliance Concerns
4.3 Intellectual Property Ownership and Licensing
Challenges and Risks in Blockchain Consortia
5.1 Managing Multiple Stakeholders and Competitor Interests
5.2 Protecting Long-Term Value and Sustainability
Strategic Recommendations for Consortium Success
6.1 Building a Future-Proof Decision-Making Framework
6.2 Leveraging IP to Drive Innovation and Collaboration
6.3 Planning for Consortium Growth and Evolution
Conclusion
Summary of key governance and structuring insights.
The importance of aligning business goals with consortium objectives.
1. Introduction
Blockchain technology has emerged as a disruptive force across industries, and blockchain consortia are becoming a key mechanism for businesses to collaborate on shared goals, develop innovative solutions, and capitalize on the potential of decentralized networks. A blockchain consortium is a partnership among multiple organizations that pools resources, knowledge, and expertise to build and manage a common blockchain platform. This collaborative approach allows companies to mitigate costs, accelerate technological development, and create industry standards for blockchain applications.
In recent years, more businesses have realized the value of joining consortia, not just to stay competitive but to pioneer new market opportunities. However, forming and maintaining a blockchain consortium comes with a host of governance, legal, and financial challenges that must be addressed from the outset. Deloitte’s "Governance and Structuring Considerations in Blockchain Consortia" report outlines the key factors organizations must consider when embarking on consortium-based blockchain initiatives.
2. Key Governance Considerations
Governance plays a central role in the success of a blockchain consortium. Without clear decision-making structures and alignment among members, consortia can struggle with inefficiencies, disputes, and stagnation. Deloitte emphasizes that establishing strong governance from the beginning is essential to creating sustainable and scalable blockchain consortia.
2.1 Decision-Making Authority
One of the most fundamental governance issues is determining how decisions will be made within the consortium. As members typically have diverse goals and contributions, finding a decision-making process that balances fairness and efficiency is crucial. Deloitte highlights the importance of answering foundational questions early on, such as:
What is the consortium’s mission?
How will voting rights be distributed?
Will decisions be based on equal voting, or will influence be tied to contributions (financial, technological, or otherwise)?
A popular governance approach is the “one plan, one vote” method, where each member has an equal say in consortium decisions. However, as the consortium scales, this system may become inefficient, causing bottlenecks if too many members are involved in every decision. As the report suggests, a more future-flexible governance structure may be needed, allowing for adaptability as the consortium grows.
2.2 Handling Disputes and Ensuring Alignment
Since many consortium members are competitors, conflicts of interest are inevitable. To ensure alignment and avoid disputes that could derail the consortium’s progress, it is critical to develop dispute resolution mechanisms that are well-documented and transparent. According to Deloitte, creating a "new business as usual" atmosphere, where members align their individual goals with the consortium’s collective mission, can help mitigate tensions and prevent issues from escalating.
2.3 Flexibility and Adaptability for Growth
A well-governed consortium needs to evolve as the business environment and technology landscape change. A governance framework that is too rigid may fail to support the consortium’s growth, leading to conflicts and decision-making paralysis. To avoid these pitfalls, Deloitte recommends designing a governance system that can adapt to new members, changing priorities, and external pressures.
3. Financial and Funding Structures
Effective financial planning is another key determinant of a blockchain consortium’s long-term success. Deloitte’s report highlights the complexities surrounding funding, revenue sharing, and financial commitments among members.
3.1 Initial Funding and Ongoing Financial Commitments
At the start, consortium members must agree on how much each party will contribute to fund the initiative and sustain its operations. Deloitte suggests that members carefully define the terms of their financial contributions, especially in cases where goals are not met, or additional funding is required. For instance, if a consortium project exceeds its initial budget, how will new funds be raised, and will existing members be asked to contribute more?
3.2 Revenue Sharing and Ownership Models
As the consortium develops intellectual property (IP) or generates new revenue streams, it becomes essential to establish a revenue-sharing model that reflects each member’s contributions. Members must decide whether profits will be shared equally or distributed based on financial or technological input. Furthermore, the consortium should anticipate how new members will be treated in terms of sharing in profits from past developments.
3.3 Financial Implications for New Members and IP Development
The onboarding of new members introduces another layer of complexity. New entrants may not have contributed to the consortium’s initial developments but could benefit from its existing IP. To manage this, Deloitte advises consortia to define ownership and compensation structures that are fair to both existing members and newcomers. This ensures the long-term sustainability of the consortium while encouraging innovation and growth.
4. Legal and Structuring Considerations
The legal foundation of a blockchain consortium is one of its most critical aspects. Determining the right legal entity structure and navigating regulatory frameworks is essential for ensuring compliance and protecting the interests of all participants.
4.1 Legal Entity Structure and Jurisdiction
Deloitte emphasizes that the choice of legal entity structure and jurisdiction is crucial in shaping the consortium’s operations. Whether the consortium is structured as a separate legal entity or as a contractual arrangement between participants, the entity’s jurisdiction will affect tax, regulatory compliance, and IP protection. Factors such as where members are located, the consortium’s operational flows, and its business goals should all influence this decision.
4.2 Tax, Regulatory, and Compliance Concerns
Given that consortia often involve members from multiple jurisdictions, the consortium must be designed to comply with tax and regulatory requirements across borders. For example, tax implications may arise from revenue-sharing models or IP ownership, and these issues must be addressed early in the consortium’s formation. Failure to account for regulatory differences can create costly disputes and compliance failures down the line.
4.3 Intellectual Property Ownership and Licensing
IP considerations are paramount in any blockchain consortium. Members must decide early on how IP generated by the consortium will be shared, licensed, and protected. For example, if one member brings pre-existing IP to the consortium, how will they be compensated if that IP is used to develop new technologies? IP ownership should be clearly defined to avoid conflicts and to ensure that members are incentivized to contribute to the consortium’s long-term success.
5. Challenges and Risks in Blockchain Consortia
Blockchain consortia, though powerful in their potential, face significant challenges that can compromise their success if not properly managed. According to Deloitte's report, addressing these challenges upfront is crucial to ensuring the sustainability and effectiveness of any consortium.
5.1 Managing Multiple Stakeholders and Competitor Interests
One of the most complex aspects of managing a blockchain consortium is balancing the interests of multiple stakeholders, many of whom may be direct competitors. This competitive dynamic can lead to friction and disagreements, especially when decisions must be made that impact shared resources, intellectual property, or revenue distribution. Deloitte highlights the need for clear, pre-defined mechanisms for conflict resolution and decision-making. Without these frameworks, consortia risk becoming paralyzed by disputes or dominated by more influential members, leading to disengagement or the collapse of the initiative.
In addition, decision-making processes that fail to account for the diverse contributions of each participant—whether financial, technological, or strategic—can result in dissatisfaction among members. Therefore, consortia should create customized governance structures that reflect the contributions of all stakeholders, allowing for proportional voting rights or tiered decision-making systems based on specific criteria.
5.2 Protecting Long-Term Value and Sustainability
The success of a blockchain consortium is not only measured by short-term goals but also by its ability to generate long-term value for its members. According to Deloitte, many consortia fail because they focus too heavily on short-term objectives, such as developing a particular product or proof-of-concept, without thinking about sustainability.
Consortia need to establish mechanisms for maintaining momentum, evolving governance models, and funding future developments. This can include adjusting revenue-sharing models as the consortium matures or adopting new technologies that improve efficiency. Protecting long-term value also means managing intellectual property (IP) effectively, ensuring that members are fairly compensated for their contributions and that newly developed IP remains a valuable asset for the consortium as it grows.
Additionally, member turnover poses a risk to long-term sustainability. As members leave the consortium or new members join, the governance and financial models may need to be restructured to ensure continuity. Deloitte advises consortia to have clear rules around onboarding new participants and maintaining consistency in operations as membership evolves.
6. Strategic Recommendations for Consortium Success
To ensure that blockchain consortia thrive, Deloitte provides several strategic recommendations. These focus on building flexible, scalable governance frameworks, leveraging intellectual property for collective benefit, and planning for the consortium’s growth and evolution.
6.1 Building a Future-Proof Decision-Making Framework
As blockchain consortia scale, the decision-making process becomes increasingly complex. While smaller consortia may initially adopt a simple "one vote per member" approach, this system often becomes untenable as more participants join or as larger organizations with more resources seek a greater say in consortium decisions. According to Deloitte, it is essential to build a future-proof decision-making framework that can scale with the consortium’s growth while ensuring fairness and efficiency.
A robust governance structure should allow for proportional voting based on member contributions or other pre-determined criteria, giving larger stakeholders more influence without marginalizing smaller participants. Additionally, consortia should plan for delegated decision-making, where certain operational decisions can be made by smaller, specialized committees or working groups. This reduces bottlenecks while ensuring that all members have a say in key strategic decisions.
6.2 Leveraging IP to Drive Innovation and Collaboration
Intellectual property is one of the most valuable assets that can emerge from a blockchain consortium. However, without clear guidelines on IP ownership and usage, consortia risk facing disputes over who controls the technology developed within the group. Deloitte advises consortia to establish early agreements on how IP will be shared, licensed, and monetized, ensuring that all participants are incentivized to contribute to the development process.
In some cases, consortia may choose to house IP in a separate legal entity, which can license the technology to individual members based on mutually agreed terms. This ensures that the consortium retains control over its innovations while allowing members to commercialize and build upon the technology in their own businesses. Additionally, clear IP policies can help the consortium attract new members, providing them with access to valuable resources while protecting the interests of existing participants.
6.3 Planning for Consortium Growth and Evolution
Successful blockchain consortia must be designed with an eye toward future expansion. As Deloitte notes, many consortia begin with a small number of members and a narrow focus, such as developing a specific technology or addressing a particular industry challenge. However, as these initiatives mature, they often expand to include new members, new use cases, and even new industries.
To accommodate this growth, consortia must create flexible governance structures that can adapt to new business models, regulatory changes, and technological advancements. This includes creating pathways for onboarding new members without disrupting the consortium’s existing operations, as well as building scalable technological infrastructure that can support increased activity and participation.
Additionally, consortia should plan for exit strategies—both for individual members and for the consortium as a whole. Members should have a clear understanding of their rights and obligations when they choose to leave the consortium, including how they will be compensated for any intellectual property or financial contributions they made during their tenure. Likewise, the consortium should have a clear plan for winding down operations if the initiative reaches its conclusion, ensuring that all members are fairly compensated for their involvement.
7. Conclusion
Deloitte’s "Governance and Structuring Considerations in Blockchain Consortia" provides a comprehensive guide to forming, managing, and scaling blockchain consortia. As blockchain technology continues to disrupt industries across the globe, consortia offer a powerful way for businesses to collaborate, share resources, and drive innovation. However, success in a blockchain consortium depends on careful planning, strong governance, and a long-term commitment from all participants.
The key to building a successful consortium lies in establishing clear decision-making processes, aligning member goals with the consortium’s objectives, and creating flexible governance structures that can adapt to the consortium’s growth. Financial considerations, including funding models and revenue-sharing agreements, must be clearly defined to ensure the consortium’s sustainability. Legal and intellectual property issues must also be addressed early on to protect the interests of all members and encourage collaboration.
Ultimately, blockchain consortia represent a new frontier in cross-industry collaboration, offering businesses the opportunity to co-develop innovative technologies and solutions. By following best practices in governance and structuring, organizations can maximize the potential of their consortia and create lasting value for all stakeholders involved.
Access Governance and Structuring Considerations in Blockchain Consortia Report
Comments